Operation Odyssey: Parliament and the Unanswered Questions

After reading through nearly seven hours of Parliamentary debate yesterday on Operation Odyssey, I now realise that I’m not the only one at a loss to know how this is all going to end and how long it might all take, let alone cost?

The debate shed little light on what might happen next should Gaddafi be defeated, overthrown or accidentally killed by a stray tomahawk missile. Government Ministers side-stepped the question of what success might look like and what the exit strategy is. Time and time again the Prime Minister and the Foreign Secretary fell back on the line that Britain can’t stand idly by whilst civilians are massacred. Nothing was given away as to where command and control responsibilities for Operation Odyssey might lie once the US takes a back seat, what ever that might mean in practice.

With so many unanswered questions you might have expected MPs to have been less than forthcoming in their support when it came to the vote. With yesterday’s debate coinciding with the ninth anniversary of the start of the second Iraq War, you might have expected a more rigorous cross-examination of government policy.

But, no ,Parliament gave the government firm and unequivocal backing – 552 Ayes and 13 Noes.

Backing for what? Well, that remains the unanswered question.

It might have been a different story if the vote had taken place on Friday before military action was taken on the Saturday. But, if reports in today’s Financial Times are to be believed that option was torpedoed by President Sarkozy’s decision to announce strikes just as he was walking out of the summit meeting in Paris.

Whatever you think about the rights and wrongs of UNSCR 1973, subsequent statements and actions hardly inspire confidence that we have a clear and convincing game plan.

About these ads
This entry was posted in British Foreign Policy, Libya and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Operation Odyssey: Parliament and the Unanswered Questions

  1. c2drl says:

    Why oh why do we never learn that heavy handed military action by the same old suspects will bring opposition from the Arab countries and cause grounds for yet more extremism and terror talk from the clerics. I cannot understand why we have gone from the seemingly good diplomacy to get the resolution approved to the gung ho firestorm of bombs and missiles not being laid on Libya by the US and Britain.

    I can’t help thinking that this has been carried along by Mr Sarkozy’s internal struggles to win the forthcoming election in France and his need to appear a strong leader. We have thrown away an opportunity and I am not at all sure why Parliement was bamboozled into rubber stamping it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s