Is Football Coming Home?

With the Korean Peninsula on the brink of a war and negotiators in Cancun working late into the night to try to save the planet, David Cameron will today fly to Zurich for the start of intensive negotiations to help bring football home. If you ever needed an illustration of what Cameron means by a commercially minded foreign policy then securing the 2018 World Cup nomination is it.  

Is football finally about to come home?

At stake isn’t just the national prestige that comes with hosting such a major sporting event and knowing that you have out marketed or in some cases out bribed your competitors. As culturally significant as these are, Cameron hopes that by securing the winning bid UK PLC will reap important economic benefits.

To be fair to him, he’s not the only political leader visiting Zurich ahead of Thursday’s all important vote. President Putin is due to fly in on Wednesday and similar political representation is due from Spain, Portugal, Belgium and the Netherlands.

Will the Spanish/Portuguese bid bomb like Torres?

With an estimated 18m visitors travelling to a nation for a month-long event, it is clear to see the commercial potential of hosting the World Cup is enormous. From improved transport networks and construction to hospitality and accommodation, the tournament brings with it billions of pounds. No wonder the whole bidding process is mired in such controversy.

Here are some interesting statistics. In the 15 FIFA Fan Fest sites throughout Germany during the 2006 tournament, over 3.5m hot dogs and 4m litres of beer were consumed by over 18m visitors. Over 19,000 staff were employed as a direct result of FIFA’s Fan Fest sites as well as creating the opportunity for official shops to make millions of pounds in revenue through the sale of official licensed products.

It is estimated that if England’s bid is successful, then its 12 host cities can expect to produce anywhere between £150m-£250m in investment and revenue. This is an astonishing figure that, in a time of recession, seems too big an opportunity to be missed.

English fans in training for 2018?

It would be great for Britain to host the World Cup.  English’s fans would have no distance to travel home after England is knocked out of the tournament in the quarter finals by Germany on penalties.  You might think this a little harsh but lets face it, the only major footballing country we’ve beaten in the last five years was Germany, and that was in a friendly. The likelihood of us actually winning the World Cup is slight.

My money though is on Russia securing 2018. I know that they have they weakest bid. Other than the UEFA Champions League final in Moscow in 2008, they haven’t hosted a high-level international sporting event in recent years. But Russia can muster many financial beneficiaries in times of need.

President 'Batman' Putin ready to do battle for Russia in Geneva.

Like South Africa in 2010, it would be a major challenge for Russia and would lead to significant infrastructure improvements across the country. In this sense, England’s bid which relies heavily on existing stadium and infrastructure might just be too safe for FIFA.

What do you think? Do you think football is coming home?

This entry was posted in World Cup and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Is Football Coming Home?

  1. Navin says:

    I don’t think we will win the vote to host 2018, I think it will be between Spain/Portugal and Russia. I don’t agree with the view that it would make us a lot of money. FIFA made something like £3 billion profit out of South Africa 2010, but the country itself made nothing and actually still owes money on all the stadia etc. And having been caught in many a train delay and/or strike I worry about 2012.

    • Thanks Navin. Surely though since we already have the stadium and therefore dont need such a large capital outlay as SA the financial dividends might be higher. Not sure I agree with the SA comment. Recognise that they are still recouping the cost of the outlay but I think medium to long term the benefits will outweight the cost. I also think it had significant economic benfits for the region per se. Like you I am dreading 2012. If we do win the 2018 maybe it might lead to some much needed investment in our transport infrastructure. That’s reason enough to support the bid!

  2. nickbaines says:

    Er… what’s this about Torres ‘bombing’?! That really hurts!

  3. c2drl says:

    I really don’t know why we bother with these showcase things (World Cup, Olympics …) If you do ther sums properly I would be prepared to wager that we loose money. All the disruption, the security, the knock on costs, and of course the shortfall on delivering new facilities or whatever that were promised. Let others have them and let us work at getting a good team and actually competing well.

    These committees are the province of the greedy. Take the Olympics as an example, all the spin off benefits are being diluted and yet we will see IOC members living in five start hotels with chauffeur driven cars and vast expenses while honest British people work as volunteers and don’t even get their travel expenses paid. GHrass roots sport? Not on their watch, they are after prestige for the few.

    • Thanks – I suspect we have more chance of making money out of the World Cup (if that is the overall aim) than we have of ever competing seriously in it. It will be interetsing to see the final balance sheet for the Olympics. Quite agree however with you that FIFA and the IOC have lost touch with reality. A little bit more transparency wouldn’t go amiss.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s